Fighting the Gurkhas
The BBC describes as a "surprise" the government's Commons defeat over the rules it intended to impose on Gurkha veterans wanting to settle in Britain. It didn't surprise me. The proposals - brought in after the High Court ruled the previous policy illegal - were cynically designed to be as exclusionary as possible. The right to settle was offered to soldiers who had served for twenty years, although the standard enlistment period is fifteen, for example.
Whether or not the government expected to lose, it's hard to see what they thought they were doing. The Gurkhas, with their near legendary status in the British army, proud history and romantic origins in the Nepalese highlands, have always been able to count on a vast reservoir of public goodwill. Once the campaign began to grant them equal rights with Commonwealth soldiers - fronted by the ever-popular Joanna Lumley - it was bound to attract widespread sympathy. Whatever points of cost or historic practice might be raised by the Home Office to keep them out were always bound to strike the average person - even allowing for the average person's general attitude towards immigration - as mean-spirited, ungrateful and cheap. I can think of few other foreign nationals wishing to settle in this country who would attract such wholehearted support from the Telegraph and the Daily Mail.
The Gurkhas, in short, are a Special Case, not just morally - they fight our wars, after all - but also politically. A wise politician knows how to choose an enemy. Margaret Thatcher had Galtieri and Scargill. Tony Blair had Slobodan Milosovic, Saddam Hussein (and Gordon Brown). Brown, meanwhile, goes into battle against a relatively small number of old soldiers who will always be far more popular than he is. He even justified the policy this lunchtime in the House of Commons, when it was clear that both Opposition parties and a fair number of his own MPs were supporting the Gurkhas. Is this not utterly insane? After his giggling YouTube performance, followed a few days later by an even more embarrassing U-turn, it certainly appeared that he had completely lost the plot. This latest fiasco proves it.
Comments
This is a victory for the Gurkhas and for natural justice. Nick Clegg has done a great job highlighting this issue and Brown is consistently now showing how tone deaf he is.
I wonder how the expenses votes will go tomorrow...
Blair would have got away with it somehow, so in a back-handed way I suppose that makes Brown better.
Good for Clegg though.
If you want a Manichaen image of the clash between light and dark, Joanna Lumley speaking on behalf of the Gurkhas versus Satan's Son of the Manse does it for me.
Would I risk my life fighting for the US for the equivalent of Gurkha pay as a multiple of Nepalese average income, expressed as a multiple of UK average income? Hell yeah.
Nepalese GDP is $1100 per head, UK is $37,000, and an entry-level soldier gets £14k per year. And damn right I'd serve in the US army for £470,000 per year...
If you're a Gurkha and go back to Nepal, you go home to a multimillionaire lifestyle. That's not a bad deal.
To lose something means you had it in the first place.
i) Gurkhas do get drunk. Very very drunk. Their favourite tipple is a type of rum made in India. They tend to chew tobacco rather than smoke it though.
ii) It doesn't matter how well paid a Gurkha is. If the government is finally getting the message that annual immigration needs to be finite, I'd rather have people who've been risking their lives for us (yes, even for money), learning to speak English and saluting the Queen,
than some bearded madman who only came here to abuse our benefits system and complain about our way of life, any day of the week.
I can't imagine what sort of cunt you'd have to be not to see that this was obvious.
when Gordon & co have welcomed the Somalis who are terrorising the indian community to such an extent in Southall that the local Labout MP spoke out and named them (in 2004!), and that a gang fight recently lead to a killing in the A&E at Ealing Hospital that closed it for six hours?